DISPOSITION OF 2011 SORs

D2011-01   D2011-01   D2011-02   D2011-FWS1   D2011-C1   D2011-C2   D2011-C3   D2011-C4   D2011-03   D2011-C5   D2011-C6   D2011-C7   D2011-04   D2011-C8   D2011-C9   D2011-C10   D2011-C11   USFWS/IDFG-D2011-1   D2011-5  

 

D2011-01   Top of Page
11-Apr-2011 2011-01 Columbia River Towboat Association Lower Granite Pool Held at MOP Plus 2 Feet April through August
1. SOR request Specifications:
The objective of this SOR is to provide for safe navigation and marine facility access in the Lower Granite pool during the fish migration season. This SOR requests that the seasonal special operation of the Lower Granite pool at Minimum Operating Pool (MOP), to accommodate out-migrating salmonids, be modified to allow for two feet of water above MOP for the period of time when MOP operations are normally in place. Typically, this is from April through August.

We find ourselves once again, in the absence of dredging since 2006, facing a problematic set of challenges triggered by mandated MOP operations in the Lower Granite pool and shoaling in the federal navigation channel. This has created an unacceptably high safety risk for river system navigators. Presently the approaches to the Ports of Lewiston and Clarkston have shoaling issues that reduce safe transit options and cause groundings and delays. Boats working in these areas are pushing mud, experiencing unexpected sheers (course diversions) from bank and bottom encroachment and generally have fewer places to run when traffic, especially recreational vessel traffic is heavy.

The channel from the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers is problematic as shoaling is shifting and therefore hard to avoid. The area close to the Camas Prairie Railroad Bridge has lost about a quarter of its designated width. The area off the Lewis and Clark Terminal in Lewiston has also shoaled to a point where maneuvering tows is so restricted that you can no longer turn a barge in that area. Even the water along the dolphin line at the terminal is shoaling causing barge groundings while loading. The Port of Clarkston is similarly afflicted with shallow water that now threatens to foreclose cruise ship, operations at that port.

In consideration of all the above, the supporters of this SOR respectfully request an change in operations to allow the Lower Granite pool to be held at MOP +2 from the beginning of April through the end of August.
2. Participants John Pigott, Columbia River Towboat Association, Wanda Keefer, Port of Clarkston; David Doeringsfeld, Port of Lewiston; Arvid Lyons, Lewis and Clark Terminal; Doug Matoon, Valley Vision, Inc., Glen Vanselow, Pacific Northwest Waterways Association (PNWA).
3. TMT recommendation TMT recommendation below is in response to the modified operation as discussed in 4. AA decision below
  1. Idaho – no objection
  2. Montana – no objection
  3. Oregon – no objection
  4. Washington – no objection
  5. Nez Perce – no objection
  6. USFWS – no objection
  7. NOAA – no objection
  8. BPA – no objection
  9. *PNWA – no objection *PNWA is not of voting member of TMT but did not object to the modified operation as discussed in section 4 below.
4. AA decision Recognizing that backwater affects the elevation of the pool at Lewiston, the Corps proposed an alternative operation to address navigation safety concerns and reduce instances when operations above MOP are required. The Corps believes this alternative is more protective of fish than the operation requested operation. The Corps alternative is to operate the Lower Granite forebay in variable 1-foot ranges between MOP and MOP+2 as a function of inflow measured at Lower Granite Dam forebay (as opposed to the proposed MOP+2 operation in the SOR). Specifically,

a. when daily average inflow is greater than or equal to 120 kcfs, Lower Granite will be operated with a maximum elevation of 734 feet for flood control.

b. When day average inflow is less than 120 kcfs but greater than or equal to 80 kcfs, Lower Granite will be operated at MOP+1 (734-735 feet).

c. When day average inflow is less than 80 kcfs but greater than or equal to 50 kcfs, Lower Granite will be operated at MOP+1.5 (734.5-735.5 feet).

d. When day average inflow is less than 50 kcfs, Lower Granite will be operated at MOP+2 (735-736 feet).

The Corps’ alternative operation would provide safe conditions with respect to depth in the area near Lewiston while operating as close to MOP as possible at Lower Granite. Tidewater and PNWA agreed that the Corps’ alternative would address their concerns, and the Corps proposed the alternative operation to TMT on Thursday morning, March 31.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation On April 9 at 0100 hours the Lower Granite Dam forebay elevation was 734.09 feet (MOP + 1, 734.0 – 735.0 feet). This marked the initiation of the implementation of the modified SOR operation as identified in section 4 above. The Corps will continue operating in accordance with the variable MOP operation as specified through 31 August.
8. If different from AA decision, why?  

 

D2011-01   Top of Page
1-Apr-2011 2011-01 NMFS, USFWS, WDFW, IDFG, ODFW, SBT, CRITFC Spill Priority List
1. SOR request Specifications:
Spill priority list for implementation (use this list until all projects are spilling to 120%) beginning April 1 through April 2 for management of excess generation spill.
        Lower Granite				41 Kcfs, or 120%
	Little Goose (night) / (daytime)	30% of instantaneous flow
	Little Goose (nighttime)		32 Kcfs, or 120%
	Lower Monumental			26 Kcfs, or 120%
	Ice Harbor				95 Kcfs, or 120%
	McNary					145 Kcfs, or 120%
        Little Goose (daytime)                  32 Kcfs, or 120%
	John Day				120 Kcfs, or 120%
	The Dalles				125 Kcfs, or 120%
	Bonneville				100 Kcfs, or 120%
	Chief Joseph				20---50---100---130--165---200
	Grand Coulee				0----5-----10----20----35----50
	Dworshak				37%--42%---50%---60%----70%
       

Beginning April 3, implement spill as described in the 2011 Fisheries Operation Plan. If there is excess generation spill, increase to the 120% at each project as described in the list above.

Justification: We understand that due to present weather conditions and the need for drafting reservoirs to the flood control elevations, there is presently excess generation spill in the hydrosystem. We recognize that this spill is involuntary spill, is unique to 2011 and is not specifically designated as spill for fish passage under the Biological Opinion.

This excess generation spill presents an opportunity to enhance fish survival. Migrating juvenile salmonids have been detected at Lower Granite Dam, indicating entry into the hydrosystem. These fish numbers have been increasing since monitoring began at Lower Granite Dam on March 25, 2011. (http://www.fpc.org/currentdaily/passindx.txt)

The Fish Passage Advisory Committee (FPAC) has met and discussed the spill priority list developed by the US Army Corps of Engineers. The FPAC has suggested to the COE that the excess generation spill should be directed to those projects where it would enhance fish survival. The FPAC spill priority recommendations for the situation currently occurring would focus the provision of spill up to the 115/120% criteria of the WA DOE exemption beginning at Lower Granite Dam and subsequently implemented at the downstream projects; Little Goose, Lower Monumental and Ice Harbor in succession to the 120% spill level before spill is provided in the lower Columbia River.

The spill priority management presented here occurs at projects that are within the States of Oregon and Washington. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality waiver goes into effect on April 1. The Washington Department of Ecology (WA DOE) exemption does not specify dates. We have requested guidance from WA DOE staff and they stated in conversation on March 30 and in an email dated March 31:

       “I have attached a copy of the June 30, 2010 Gas Abatement Plan approval that is required under WAC 173-201A-200
       (1)(f)(ii). This approval is required before operators may apply the adjusted water quality criteria for total 
       dissolved gas. As we discussed during our phone conversation yesterday, Ecology does not explicitly state dates 
       in the approval letter to the Corps when the adjustment may be applied. However, David Wills is correct in his 
       description below of the USACE 2008 approval letter which states "General fish spill seasons are April through 
       August" and General non-fish spill seasons are September through March". This language is not in the 2010 approval
       letter, but this statement remains true for the implementation of the fish passage TDG criteria adjustment. 
       Spill to aid fish passage over hydroelectric dams is generally expected to occur in the noted time period, but 
       Washington recognizes that flexibility to these general seasons may be necessary. It is more important to note 
       that the adjustment criteria apply only when there is evidence that juvenile salmon migration is occurring.”
Current monitoring of fish at Lower Granite Dam shows that fish are present and that spill to 120% TDG levels would aid fish passage. Monitoring in accordance with the terms of the WA DOE exemption is ongoing.

The above mentioned salmon managers believe that we are presented with a unique opportunity to enhance survival of juvenile migrating salmonids while staying within the accepted TDG requirements. Therefore, we request that the COE consider implementing the spill of excess generation as described above, beginning immediately at Lower Granite Dam.

As the fish passage season progresses, the salmon managers may make further suggested changes to the spill priority list as needed in relation to the fish migration needs or concerns. We expect to make these suggested changes through the TMT process.
2. Participants National Marine Fisheries Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
3. TMT recommendation Steve Barton, COE, shared a ‘COE Proposed Spill Priority List’ that he said reflected the request. He asked for a few clarifications on the request for the period April 1-2 (prior to beginning of the court-ordered spill program). The salmon managers clarified the intent was to operate to the TDG percentages rather than specific spill amounts that were coupled with the percentages in the SOR; that Little Goose should spill first daytime to 30% of total river flow, then nighttime to 30% total river flow, then nighttime to 120% TDG; and that the intent with the projects from Chief Joseph to Dworshak was to spill to specific percentages at these projects after all other projects had reached 120%; then after all projects on the entire list reached 120%, spill to 125%, 130%, etc starting at the top of the list and moving down in the order listed in the SOR.

TMT members supported or did not object to the COE’s proposal. Members present on the call included representatives from Oregon, Idaho, Washington, Montana, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR), USFWS, NOAA, BPA and the COE.

With regard to April 3 and beyond, TMT discussed the need to provide the most biologically sound spill priority while the fish are moving through the system and to stay in line with the court ordered spill program. As such, the COE planned to use the spill priority list and process as described in the 3/30 version of the list that was discussed at TMT that day. TMT members were polled on this plan, and many expressed a caveat that the list needs to be revisited throughout the spill season to understand how it is being used and whether changes should be made to it given changing conditions:

• Oregon: – No objection
• Washington: – No objection
• Idaho: – No objection
• USFWS: – No objection
• Montana: – No objection
• NOAA: – No objection
• USFWS: – No objection
• CTUIR: – No objection
• BPA: – No objection
4. AA decision Hearing no objection to the Corps’ proposed spill priority list, the following spill priority list was implemented from April 1-2:

1) spill Lower Granite to 120% gas cap
2) spill Little Goose to 30% of the total river flow during the day
3) spill Little Goose to 30% of the total river flow during the night
4) spill Little Goose to 120% gas cap during the night
5) spill Lower Monumental to 120% gas cap
6) spill Ice Harbor to 120% gas cap
7) spill McNary To 120% gas cap
8) spill Little Goose to 120% gas cap during the day
9) spill John Day to 120% gas cap
10) spill The Dalles to 120% gas cap
11) spill Bonneville to 120% gas cap
12) spill Chief Joseph to 110% gas cap
13) spill Grand Coulee to 110% gas cap
14) spill Dworshak to 110% gas cap
15) spill Chief Joseph to 115% gas cap
16) spill Grand Coulee to 115% gas cap
17) spill Chief Joseph to 120% gas cap
18) spill Grand Coulee to 120% gas cap
19) spill Lower Granite to 125 gas cap
20) spill Little Goose to 125% gas cap
21) spill Lower Monumental to 125% gas cap
22) spill Ice Harbor to 125% gas cap
23) spill McNary to 125% gas cap
24) spill John Day to 125% gas cap
25) spill The Dalles to 125% gas cap
26) spill Bonneville to 125% gas cap
27) spill Chief Joseph to 125% gas cap
28) spill Grand Coulee to 125% gas cap
29) spill Lower Granite to 130 gas cap
30) spill Little Goose to 130% gas cap
31) spill Lower Monumental to 130% gas cap
32) spill Ice Harbor to 130% gas cap
33) spill McNary to 130% gas cap
34) spill John Day to 130% gas cap
35) spill The Dalles to 130% gas cap
36) spill Bonneville to 130% gas cap
37) spill Chief Joseph to 130% gas cap
38) spill Grand Coulee to 130% gas cap
39) spill Lower Granite to 135 gas cap
40) spill Little Goose to 135% gas cap
41) spill Lower Monumental to 135% gas cap
42) spill Ice Harbor to 135% gas cap
43) spill McNary to 135% gas cap
44) spill John Day to 135% gas cap
45) spill The Dalles to 135% gas cap
46) spill Bonneville to 135% gas cap
47) spill Chief Joseph to 135% gas cap
48) spill Grand Coulee to 135% gas cap

For April 3 and beyond, involuntary spill due to lack of load would be handled through the existing spill priority list, agreeing that any adjustments will need to be revisited as the season progresses in TMT.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation There was limited involuntary spill due to lack of load on April 1-2. All spill under this condition was consistent with the order and level specified in the list above.

On April 3, the above list expired and involuntary spill due to lack of load, if needed, was managed using the prior spill priority list.
8. If different from AA decision, why?  

 

D2011-02   Top of Page
12-April-2011 2011-02a Lower Monumnetal Spill Pattern NOAA, USFWS,WDFW, IDFG, ODFW, SBT, and CRITFC Lower Monumnetal Spill Pattern
1. SOR request Specifications:
Beginning immediately, use the uniform spill pattern at Lower Monumental Dam (2011 FPP, Table LMN-13) when day average flows at Lower Monumental Dam are expected to be at or above 100 Kcfs. The ERDC modeling trip planned for next week will be used to evaluate whether reducing the flow trigger to 80 or 90 Kcfs for this change is advisable. When day average flows at Lower Monumental are expected to be below this trigger, use the bulk spill pattern at Lower Monumental Dam (2011 FPP, Table LMN-12).

Justification:
Concerning spill patterns at Lower Monumental Dam, the 2011 Spring Fish Operation Plan states: Changes in Operations for Research Purposes: Spring research operations: There are no special spill operations for research planned in 2011. The “bulk” spill pattern as described in FPP Section 7 will be used. Based on previous years’ study results, dam survival is higher using the “bulk” spill pattern compared to the “uniform” spill pattern.

While the bulk pattern can show higher survival under certain flow and power house loading conditions, the conditions prevailing at the current time and going forward for the next several weeks favor the use of the uniform spill pattern. The uniform pattern can create a large eddy when the power house is lightly loaded. This eddy increases the risk to both fish that passed over the spillway and fish that are discharged through the juvenile bypass pipe. Under the existing conditions of a more fully loaded powerhouse the uniform pattern will not create a large eddy and will increase the number of fish being passed by way of the spillway by allowing higher spill volume.

The Ice Harbor forebay TDG monitor is typically the limiting factor for the Lower Monumental spill caps. In the 2009 study of bulk and uniform spill patterns at Lower Monumental Dam, the spill cap at Lower Monumental Dam was routinely higher when operating under the uniform pattern than when operating under the bulk pattern. This indicates that TDG from Lower Monumental may be reduced if Lower Monumental Dam were to be operated under the uniform spill pattern. During this test, average spill proportions under the two spill patterns were 0.27 for the bulk spill pattern and 0.38 for the uniform spill pattern. Using a uniform spill pattern at Lower Monumental Dam when flows are at or above 100 Kcfs would generate less total dissolved gas and allow a higher proportion of juvenile fish to pass Lower Monumental Dam via spillways, while not detracting from direct survival.

2. Participants National Marine Fisheries Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
3. TMT recommendation The Technical Management Team (TMT) did not reach a unanimous decision to implement SOR 2011-02 during the April 13 TMT Meeting. The Corps proposed an alternative operation to the TMT as follows: Switch from the Bulk to Uniform pattern at Lower Monumental Dam when either A) flows exceed turbine capacity plus Fish Operations Plan (FOP) spill (occurs at ~140 kcfs) or B) when spill over the FOP specified amount is required due to lack of market spill at any flow level. If either of these conditions is likely to occur for 3 or more days, the Corps will use the Uniform spill pattern instead of the Bulk spill pattern as specified in the 2011 Spring FOP. There were no objections to the alternative proposed operation from any TMT sovereigns. Oregon elevated the decision on whether to implement SOR 2011-02 to the RIOG.
4. AA decision Send to RIOG
5. RIOG Recommendation The Senior Hydro Technical Team convened and prepared a briefing paper on the issue for consideration by the RIOG. After review of the briefing paper, there was not unanimous support to implement SOR 2011-02 among RIOG members.
6. AA decision (after IT) The Corps’ decision is not to implement SOR 2011-02 however, in accordance with the unanimous support of the Corps’ alternative operation by all sovereigns at TMT, the Corps will implement the proposed alternative operation as stated above. The Corps took into consideration information from the TMT, the Senior Hydro Technical Team, and the RIOG to make its decision on whether to implement SOR 2011-02. The Corps also relied heavily on the results of a survival study conducted at Lower Monumental Dam in 2009 that compared the survival (concrete and route) of yearling Chinook and steelhead passing the dam under both Bulk and Uniform spill patterns. The study showed there were no statistically significant differences observed under the conditions tested; either in route survival or overall concrete survival. In fact, the point estimates of concrete survival for both yearling Chinook and steelhead were higher under the Bulk spill pattern compared to the Uniform spill pattern. Furthermore, although the 2009 study was not intended to be a performance standard evaluation, point estimates of concrete survival were above the BiOp performance standard level (96%) for both yearling Chinook and steelhead under both Bulk and Uniform spill patterns. On this basis, the Corps recommends continuing the Bulk spill pattern under the current project configuration as stated in the 2011 Spring FOP, transitioning to the Uniform spill pattern when over-generation spill occurs as specified in the Corps’ alternative operation described above.
7. Actual Operation The Corps implemented the following operation: switch from the Bulk to Uniform pattern at Lower Monumental Dam when either A) flows exceed turbine capacity plus Fish Operations Plan (FOP) spill (occurs at ~140 kcfs) or B) when spill over the FOP specified amount is required due to lack of market spill at any flow level. If either of these conditions is likely to occur for 3 or more days, the Corps will use the Uniform spill pattern instead of the Bulk spillpattern as specified in the 2011 Spring FOP.
8. If different from AA decision, why?  

 

D2011-FWS1   Top of Page
16-May-2011 2011-FWS1 USFWS, IDFG 2011 Libby Dam Releases for Sturgeon and Bull Trout Augmentation
1. SOR request

SPECIFICATIONS:

Based on the Fish and Wildlife Service’s February 2006 Biological Opinion (2006 BO) on operations of Libby Dam, and the May final April-August volume 
runoff forecast of 8.165 million acre-feet, we are within a Tier 5 operations year for Kootenai River white sturgeon. The minimum recommended release 
volume for sturgeon conservation in a Tier 5 year is 1.20 million acre-feet and we recommend the following procedures for discharge of at least this 
minimum volume from Libby Dam:

•	With Spill (reservoir above elevation 2415’)

Begin releases of sturgeon volume from Libby Dam once the following conditions are met:  Kootenai River temperatures at Bonners Ferry reach 8° C, 
and Koocanusa Reservoir elevation reaches at least 2,415’ MSL; at least one tagged F4 sturgeon is positioned at Ambush Rock; and the forebay of 
Koocanusa Reservoir warms such that 20-35,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) can be released in unison through the turbines and over the spillway 
without decreasing Libby Dam release temperatures by more than 2° C.

Ascending Limb: When these conditions are met, increase discharge from Libby Dam (according to ramping rates in the 2006 BO) to 15,000 cfs for 
3 days, followed by discharge of 20,000 cfs for 3 days, discharge of full powerhouse capacity (PHC) for 3 days, and maintain peak discharge of 
PHC plus spill of up to 10,000 cfs for 7 days.  

Alternatively, if discharges from Libby Dam are higher than 15,000 cfs prior to commencement of sturgeon operations, once the conditions described 
above are met, increase discharge from Libby Dam (according to ramping rates in the 2006 BO) to 20,000 cfs for 4 days, followed by discharge of PHC 
for 5 days, and maintain peak discharge of PHC plus spill of up to 10,000 cfs for 7 days.

Descending Limb: At approximately 6:00 AM, following peak outflow, reduce discharge from Libby Dam to PHC for 4 days.  After four days at PHC, reduce 
discharge to 20,000 cfs for at least 3 days.  This discharge period may be extended if necessary to reduce the rate of reservoir refill.  

•	If the modeled summer flat flow (targeting reservoir elevation of 2,439’ at the end of September) is 15,000 cfs or greater, maintain discharge 
        of 17,000 cfs until the sturgeon volume is exhausted.

•	If the modeled summer flat flow is less than 15,000 cfs, then starting at about 6:00 AM, following the period of 17,000 cfs discharge, reduce 
        Libby Dam discharge to 15,000 cfs, then maintain 15,000 cfs discharge until the sturgeon volume is exhausted, or gradually reduce discharge to 
        the summer flat flow. During this gradual discharge reduction, the Corps should avoid a double peak in outflow between sturgeon and summer 
        operations.

Note: The intent of extending flow at this rate is to delay reservoir refill until inflows recede to below turbine discharge capacity, and to make a 
smooth transition from the spring peak to the lower, stabilized summer flow.

•	Without Spill 

Given the higher water supply volume in the Kootenai Basin in 2011, it is likely that flood risk reduction operations will supersede sturgeon augmentation 
operations.  In such a scenario, Kootenai River stages may be at or near flood stage prior to sturgeon operations, rendering spill unfeasible or undesirable.  

As always, flood risk reduction operations supersede sturgeon flow augmentation, and dam managers will coordinate operations with regional sturgeon managers.

Sturgeon augmentation discharge may be extended for additional days if the Corps elects to provide volume in excess of the minimum volume requirement in the 
2006 BO and to control the refill rate of Libby Dam.

Provide stable or gradually declining discharge through the end of September following ramping rates and minimum flow guidelines in the 2006 BO for bull 
trout and white sturgeon.  

Additional recommendations may be provided as water supply forecasts are updated. 

JUSTIFICATION:

A continued effort is needed to provide spawning and incubation flows to meet habitat attributes for depth, velocity and temperature in the Kootenai River as 
defined in the 2008 BO Clarified Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) for Kootenai River white sturgeon (Table 1).  The clarified RPA states that if 2008 
and 2009 sturgeon operations at Libby Dam are determined to be “not successful”, the action agencies (the Corps and BPA) will operate Libby Dam in 2010 through 
2012 to provide additional flows by spilling in excess of powerhouse capacity consistent with a waiver of the Total Dissolved Gas (TDG) water quality standard 
provided by the State of Montana.  The Service issued its determination of “not successful” for 2008 sturgeon operations on April 20, 2009, and issued a “not 
successful” determination for 2009 operations on December 16, 2009, thus triggering the action agencies to implement provisions to provide flows in excess of 
powerhouse capacity in operating years 2010 through 2012.

The USGS performed data analysis of the 2006 through 2009 sturgeon augmentation flows in order to assess depth attribute attainment as per the 2006 BO.  
Kootenay Lake backwater extent varied, but in general a flow of roughly 35,000 cfs at Bonners Ferry provided river depth in the braided reach (RM 152 to 
RM 157) that met or exceeded the minimum 16.5 ft depth attribute.


Table 1.  Kootenai Sturgeon Habitat Attributes from 2008 Libby Dam BO RPA Clarification.


Attribute: Area: RM 141.4 to RM 159.7
Measure:	
Objective:

Attribute: Timing of Augmentation Flows
Measure:   May into July (triggered by sturgeon spawning condition), in all years except for Tier 1.	
Objective: Provide conditions for normal migration and spawning behavior.

Attribute: Duration of Peak Augmentation Flows for Adult Migration and Spawning.
Measure:   Maximize peak augmentation flows with available water for as many days as possible, up to 14 days during the peak of the spawning period 
           with pulses, in all years except for Tier 1.	
Objective: Through in-season management, provide peak augmentation flows that lead to a biological benefit for sturgeon to maximize migration and 
           spawning behavior via a normalized hydrograph.

Attribute: Duration of Post-Peak Augmentation Flows for Incubation and Rearing.
Measure:   Maximize post-peak augmentation flows with available water for as many days as possible, up to 21 days, in all years except for Tier 1.	
Objective: Through in-season management, provide post-peak augmentation flows that lead to a biological benefit for sturgeon to maximize 
           embryo/free-embryo incubation and rearing via descending limb of a normalized hydrograph.

Attribute: Minimum Flow Velocity.
Measure:   3.3 ft/s and greater in approximately 60% of the area of rocky substrate in the area of RM 152 to RM 157 during post-peak augmentation flows.	
Objective: Provide conditions for spawning and embryo/free-embryo incubation and rearing.

Attribute: Temperature Fluctuation.
Measure:   Optimize temperature releases at Libby Dam to maintain 50° F with no more than a 3.6° F drop.	
Objective: Provide conditions for normal migration and spawning behavior via a normalized thermograph.

Attribute: Depth at Spawning Sites.
Measure:   Intermittent depths of 16.5 to 23 ft or greater in 60% of the area of rocky substrate from RM 152 to RM 157 during peak augmentation flows.	
Objective: Provide conditions for normal migration and spawning behavior.

Attribute: Substrate Extent/Spawning Structures
Measure:   Approximately 5 miles of continuous rocky substrate; create conditions/features that improve the likelihood of recruitment success.	
Objective: Provide habitat for embryo/free-embryo incubation and rearing.

Attribute: Minimum Frequency of Occurrence
Measure:   To facilitate meeting the attributes via: powerhouse plus up to 10,000 cfs flow test: a flow test will occur 2010 through 2012 (or until
           the Kootenai River Restoration Project is implemented) if the Service determines in 2008 and 2009 that the success criteria described in 
           Action 1.3(b) have not been met.
Objective: Habitat improvement projects and other options: through adaptive management, as noted in RPA Components 2 and 5, implement the Kootenai 
           River Restoration Project by the aspirational date of 2012-2016.
 
2In order to develop an agreed-upon estimate and measurement of the areal extent of the velocity and depth attributes, the Action Agencies shall, 
together with the Service and in collaboration with other involved parties as needed, develop appropriate assessment tools (e.g., hydrologic models) 
of the braided reach.
			
Operation of Libby Dam for sturgeon flow augmentation and temperature management during 2008 may have influenced the timing, extent, and duration of 
sturgeon pre-spawning migration.  Discharge temperatures during 2008 warmed later than usual and IDFG documented that one tagged sturgeon migrated 
further upstream than had been previously observed.  The 2011 sturgeon pulse and thermograph will be managed to maximize the upstream migration of 
adults and to optimize conditions during the egg incubation and embryonic stages.  Additional flows from spill will coincide with discharges through 
the powerhouse to ensure release temperatures can be sustained at or above 50° F at Bonners Ferry.  The operation will attempt to avoid a sudden 
decline in temperature during the spawning and incubation phase.

The operating parameters outlined in this SOR are intended to provide some guidance on how to achieve the attributes listed in Table 1 of the 2006 
USFWS BO, given the current water supply forecast.  Previous years operations have shown that conditions at Libby Dam and in the Kootenai River basin 
can change rapidly. Recognizing this, the start date and exact shape of the operation will need to be developed and modified in-season as more is known. 
The in-season coordination will occur in the sturgeon technical team and with a final recommendation coordinated through the action agencies and the 
Technical Management Team.

2. Participants Brian Kelly, State Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office, on behalf of the Libby BO Policy Group.
3. TMT recommendation  
4. AA decision  
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation  
8. If different from AA decision, why?  

 

D2011-C1   Top of Page
14-June-2011 2011-C1 CRITFC Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Summer 2011 Treaty Fishery
1. SOR request Specifications: Implement the following pool operations as a hard system constraint, as follows: June 16, 2011, 6 am, Thursday, through 6 pm, June 18, 2011, Saturday. June 20, 2011, 6 am, Monday, through 6 pm, June 23, 2011, Thursday. Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period.

2. Participants Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
3. TMT recommendation TMT members responded that John Day would continue with a 1.5' operating band. The 1.5' operating bands at Bonneville and The Dalles were agreed to as soft constraints, due to the challenge of meeting the criteria during high flows.
4. AA decision 1) Operate Bonneville under a 1.5' soft constraint,
2) The Dalles under a 1.5’ soft constraint, and
3) John Day under a 1.5' hard constraint. Language in the CBT sent by the Corps stated operate Bonneville and The Dalles within a 1.5 foot band, soft constraint from 0600 hours on Thursday, 16 June – 1800 hours on Saturday, 18 June and again from 0600 hours Monday, 20 June – 1800 hours Thursday, 23 June during Treaty Fishing. The John Day pool is operated in a 1.5 foot band under a separate CBT special operation as required by the 2008 BiOp.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation During the 60 one hour intervals associated with the SOR for June 16 - June 18, the Corps maintained the following system constraints 100% of the time:

Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance.

84 one hour intervals associated with the SOR for June 20 - June 23, the Corps maintained the following hard system constraints 99% of the time:

Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- Max pool range 1.7 feet, 99% compliance. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- Max pool range 1.6 feet, 99% compliance. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance.

8. If different from AA decision, why?  

 

D2011-C2   Top of Page
24-June-2011 2011-C2 CRITFC Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Summer 2011 Treaty Fishery
1. SOR request Specifications: Implement the following pool operations as a hard system constraint, as follows: June 27, 2011, 6 am, Monday, through 6 pm, June 30, 2011, Thursday. Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period.

2. Participants Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
3. TMT recommendation TMT members responded that John Day would continue with a 1.5' operating band. The 1.5' operating bands at Bonneville and The Dalles were agreed to as soft constraints, due to the challenge of meeting the criteria during high flows.
4. AA decision 1) Operate Bonneville under a 1.5' soft constraint,
2) The Dalles under a 1.5’ soft constraint, and
3) John Day under a 1.5' hard constraint. Language in the CBT sent by the Corps stated operate Bonneville and The Dalles within a 1.5 foot band, soft constraint from 0600 hours on Monday, 27 June – 1800 hours on Thursday, 30 June. The John Day pool is operated in a 1.5 foot band under a separate CBT special operation as required by the 2008 BiOp.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation During the 84 one hour intervals associated with the SOR for June 27 - June 30, the Corps maintained the following system constraints 100% of the time:

Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance.

8. If different from AA decision, why?  

 

D2011-C3   Top of Page
30-June-2011 2011-C3 CRITFC Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Summer 2011 Treaty Fishery
1. SOR request Specifications: Implement the following pool operations as a hard system constraint, as follows: July 5, 2011, 6 am, Tuesday, through 6 pm, July 8, 2011, Friday. Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period.

2. Participants Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
3. TMT recommendation TMT members responded that John Day would continue with a 1.5' operating band. The 1.5' operating bands at Bonneville and The Dalles were agreed to as soft constraints, due to the challenge of meeting the criteria during high flows.
4. AA decision 1) Operate Bonneville under a 1.5' soft constraint,
2) The Dalles under a 1.5’ soft constraint, and
3) John Day under a 1.5' hard constraint. Language in the CBT sent by the Corps stated operate Bonneville and The Dalles within a 1.5 foot band, soft constraint from 0600 hours on Tuesday, 05 July – 1800 hours on Friday, 08 July. The John Day pool is operated in a 1.5 foot band under a separate CBT special operation as required by the 2008 BiOp.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation During the 84 one hour intervals associated with the SOR for July 05 - July 08, the Corps maintained the following system constraints 100% of the time:

Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance.

8. If different from AA decision, why?  

 

D2011-C4   Top of Page
7-July-2011 2011-C4 CRITFC Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Summer 2011 Treaty Fishery
1. SOR request Specifications: Implement the following pool operations as a hard system constraint, as follows: July 11 2011, 6 am, Monday, through 6 pm, July 15, 2011, Friday. Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period.

2. Participants Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
3. TMT recommendation TMT members responded that John Day would continue with a 1.5' operating band. The 1.5' operating bands at Bonneville and The Dalles were agreed to as soft constraints, due to the challenge of meeting the criteria during high flows.
4. AA decision 1) Operate Bonneville under a 1.5' soft constraint,
2) The Dalles under a 1.5’ soft constraint, and
3) John Day under a 1.5' hard constraint. Language in the CBT sent by the Corps stated operate Bonneville and The Dalles within a 1.5 foot band, soft constraint from 0600 hours on Monday, 11 July – 1800 hours on Friday, 15 July during Treaty Fishing. The John Day pool is operated in a 1.5 foot band under a separate CBT special operation as required by the 2008 BiOp.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation During the 108 one hour intervals associated with the SOR for July 11 - July 15, the Corps maintained the following system constraints:

Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 78% compliance. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 95% compliance. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance.

8. If different from AA decision, why? AA decision was to operate in a 1.5 foot band as a soft constraint due to continuing high flows. Bonneville Dam, being the lowest most of the Columbia dam was the most challenging to operate but still was able to operate in a 1.5 foot band 78% of the listed hours.

 

D2011-03   Top of Page
19-July-2011 2011-03 USFWS,WDFW, ODFW, NPT, SBT Nightime Spill to the gas cap at Little Goose Dam
1. SOR request Specifications:
During periods of Lower Granite pool operation above MOP for navigation safety issues according to SOR 2011-1; spill to the 115/120% gas cap at Little Goose Dam during nighttime hours beginning immediately, and continuing through the remainder of the 2011 juvenile fish passage season.

Justification:
Reasonable and prudent alternative # 5 of the 2008 Biological Opinion specifies that the Lower Snake River reservoirs be operated at minimum operating pool during the juvenile fish spill passage season to minimize water travel time through the reservoir to improve juvenile survival. In early April, the Columbia River Towboat Association submitted SOR 2011-1 to TMT to allow the Lower Granite reservoir to operate at an elevation above MOP+1 to address navigation safety concerns. The concerns were raised relative to the lack of federal maintenance of the navigation channel, with no dredging occurring since 2006. This lack of maintenance has lead to shoaling in the federal navigation channel and navigation concerns.

Since the proposed operation of Lower Granite reservoir above the MOP elevation identified in the 2008 Biological Opinion will result in a reduction in planned fish protection, we request that the Action Agencies adjust the operation of the FCRPS to provide similar protection levels as planned for in the 2008 Biological Opinion. Therefore, we are requesting that spill at Little Goose Dam be increased to gas cap levels during nighttime hours for the remainder of the summer spill season. This nighttime operation will help maintain juvenile survival at the level that would occur if Lower Granite was operated as planned in the 2008 Biological Opinion, by decreasing the migration rate in the lower Snake River that was increased by operating the Lower Granite Reservoir above MOP.

2. Participants US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Nez Perce Tribe, and the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes.
3. TMT recommendation TMT Members provided the following responses to the SOR during the July 20, 2011, TMT meeting:
• Idaho – During early spring discussions of the towboaters’ request for operating Lower Granite outside MOP, the COE invited the salmon managers to consider and bring forth options for making the river ‘whole’ during various points of operating that project outside MOP. The salmon managers saw the most impact would happen when flows recede to a level prompting MOP+2, and this SOR was offered as a preferred option for offsetting that impact. Idaho did not sign on to the SOR given the biological ‘gray areas’ around this issue, but does feel strongly that the issue needs to be resolved by next spring and would like the COE to work with the region to get a plan in place by then. No objection to the SOR.

• NOAA – Given that Fall Chinook’s propensity to migrate goes down this late in the migration season, NOAA does not feel a need for an adjustment operation at this time. That said, a solution and plan for next spring is needed. The COE should present TMT options for addressing the Lower Granite pool issue, including emergency dredging. No objection to the SOR.

• USFWS – Signed on and supports the SOR as a reasonable request to help balance the intent of the BiOp.

• Oregon – This is a reasonable operation and we would like to see it implemented.

• Washington – Signed on and supports the SOR.

• Montana – Questions about next year, but does not see a compelling biological reason to implement the request at this time. No objection to the SOR.

• Salish-Kootenai Tribe – No objection.

• CRITFC – Unable to comment due to other procedural obligations.

• BPA – Unable to comment; need to discuss internally.

• Reclamation – No objection.

4. AA decision Action Agencies presented the decision not to implement the SOR during the July 27, 2011 TMT meeting. Salmon Manager signatories on the SOR were not unanimous nor was there unanimous agreement to implement the SOR among TMT members during the July 20, 2011, TMT meeting.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation  
8. If different from AA decision, why?  

 

D2011-C5   Top of Page
13-July-2011 2011-C5 CRITFC Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Summer 2011 Treaty Fishery
1. SOR request Specifications: Implement the following pool operations as a hard system constraint, as follows: JuLy 18, 2011, 6 am, Monday, through 6 pm, Julu 21, 2011, Thursday. Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period.

2. Participants Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
3. TMT recommendation TMT members responded that John Day would continue with a 1.5' operating band. The 1.5' operating bands at Bonneville and The Dalles were agreed to as soft constraints, due to the challenge of meeting the criteria during high flows.
4. AA decision 1) Operate Bonneville under a 1.5' soft constraint,
2) The Dalles under a 1.5’ soft constraint, and
3) John Day under a 1.5' hard constraint. Language in the CBT sent by the Corps stated operate Bonneville and The Dalles within a 1.5 foot band, soft constraint from 0600 hours on Monday, 18 July – 1800 hours on Thursday, 21 July. The John Day pool is operated in a 1.5 foot band under a separate CBT special operation as required by the 2008 BiOp.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation During the 84 one hour intervals associated with the SOR for July 18 - July 21, the Corps maintained the following system constraints:

Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 97.6% compliance. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 25% compliance, per the offiical gage, but gage data is questionable. See paragraph 8. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance.

8. If different from AA decision, why? The AA decision was to operate the pools in the 1.5 foot band as a soft constraint due to continuing high flow conditions. Bonneville Dam was able to meet the 1.5 foot operating band conditon for nearly 98% of the time for the listed hours. The Dalles Pool met the 1.5 foot band, as a soft constraint, 25% of the time, according to the official gage. It was discovered that the gage had a bad transducer, which was subsequently replaced. Estimates of the actual forebay changes suggest that the 1.5 foot band was met nearly 100% of the time, but there is no methodology to provide a precision for this estimate.

 

D2011-C6   Top of Page
25-July-2011 2011-C6 CRITFC Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Summer 2011 Treaty Fishery
1. SOR request Specifications: Implement the following pool operations as a hard system constraint, as follows: July 25, 2011, 6 am, Monday, through 6 pm, July 30, 2011, Saturday. Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period.

2. Participants Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
3. TMT recommendation TMT members responded that John Day would continue with a 1.5' operating band. The 1.5' operating bands at Bonneville and The Dalles were agreed to as soft constraints, due to the challenge of meeting the criteria during high flows.
4. AA decision 1) Operate Bonneville under a 1.5' soft constraint,
2) The Dalles under a 1.5’ soft constraint, and
3) John Day under a 1.5' hard constraint. Language in the CBT sent by the Corps stated operate Bonneville and The Dalles within a 1.5 foot band, soft constraint from 0600 hours on Monday, 25 July – 1800 hours on Saturday, 30 July. The John Day pool is operated in a 1.5 foot band under a separate CBT special operation as required by the 2008 BiOp.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation During the 84 one hour intervals associated with the SOR for July 25 - July 30, the Corps maintained the following system constraints:

Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 91.7% compliance. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance.

8. If different from AA decision, why? The AA decision was to operate the pools in the 1.5 foot band as a soft constraint due to "lingering" high flow conditions. Bonneville Dam was able to meet the 1.5 foot operating band conditon for nearly 92% of the total 132 hours. For a total of 11 hours the project exceeded the 1.5 foot band by a very modest 0.1 to 0.2 feet.

 

D2011-C7   Top of Page
1-August-2011 2011-C7 CRITFC Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Autumn 2011 Treaty Fishery
1. SOR request Specifications: Implement the following pool operations as a hard system constraint, as follows: August 22 2011, 6 am, Monday, through 6 pm, August 25, 2011, Thursday. August 30 2011, 6 am, Tuesday, through 6 pm, September 2, 2011, Friday. September 6 2011, 6 am, Tuesday, through 6 pm, September 9, 2011, Friday. Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period.

2. Participants Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
3. TMT recommendation No objections were received from TMT.
4. AA decision The Corps agreed to operating the Bonneville, John Day and Dalles pools within a 1.5' operating band, hard constraint. Note that the 2008 BiOp sets a 1.5 foot operating range at John Day, hard constraint, through 30 September.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation During the 84 one hour intervals associated with the SOR, Aug 22 - 25, the Corps maintained the following system constraints:

Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 98% compliance. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period --100% compliance. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance. For the 84 hours compliance was 100% Aug 22 - Aug 25 for The Dalles and John Day. For that same period Bonneville was 98% compliance. For the periods of Aug 30 - Sept 2 84 hr. and Sept 6 - Sept 9 100% compliance was everywhere.

8. If different from AA decision, why? For the period Aug 22 - 25 The slight deviation at Bonneville was due to late season low flow conditions and gage and inflow uncertainties.

 

D2011-04   Top of Page
2-August-2011 2011-04 Kootenai Tribe of Idaho; Sue Ireland, Fish and Wildlife Department Director September/October 2011 Libby Dam Outflow for Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Project, Phase 1, Braided Reach
1. SOR request Specifications:
Release minimal outflow from Libby Dam during September (6,000 cfs minimum bull trout flow) and October (4,000 cfs minimum), 2011.

Justification:
Minimum flows in the Kootenai River in September and October are requested to allow the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho’s contractor to de-water two areas (channels) located in the Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Project, Phase 1, Braided Reach 1 project area. The restoration strategy for this portion of the project is to stabilize eroding banks, trap sediment and promote floodplain development, increase riparian vegetation, and increase channel margin and side channel complexity. The Phase 1 effort will result in restoration of approximately 4,000 feet of river bank and will substantially reduce sediment loading that is contributing to degraded habitat conditions downstream.

• Provide gradually declining discharge to the target flow following ramping rates and minimum flow guidelines in the 2006 BiOp for bull trout and white sturgeon.

• The proposed operation is requested in order to implement the Tribe’s Phase 1, Braided Reach 1 portion of the Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Project. The proposed operation will also ensure action agency compliance with the USFWS Biological Opinion regarding the Effects of Libby Dam Operations on the Kootenai River White Sturgeon, Bull Trout, and Kootenai Sturgeon Critical Habitat (1901F0279R) as clarified (2008). Action 2.1 under RPA Component 2 (Management of Sturgeon Habitat) calls for action agency cooperation in implementing the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho’s Kootenai River Restoration Project Master Plan. If construction is not implemented by 2012, re-initiation of consultation will be triggered, interim river operations shall continue, and the action agencies shall evaluate the benefits to sturgeon associated with additional Kootenai River flows through the use of spill over Libby Dam pursuant to Action 1.5.

2. Participants Kootenai Tribe of Idaho
3. TMT recommendation The following summarizes TMT members comments on the SOR during the August 3, 2011, TMT meeting.

• Oregon – Does not object to implementing the operation for now; needs to check with policy to determine if the deviation from the BiOp (meeting elevation 2449’ in September) is acceptable. *NOTE: A follow up email was sent to the COE from Rick Kruger to the effect that Oregon does not object to the Corp's proposed operation in order to implement SOR 2011-04 with the understanding that the Corps would make best efforts to draft Libby to 2449’ by August 31 and may be higher or lower than 2449’ by the end of September.

• Montana – Supports this operation to meet the request and believes it is a good plan. Would prefer to meet the specified 6 kcfs flat flow in September at the risk of the reservoir ending above or below the 2449’ target at the end of September.

• Washington – No objection to the proposed operation to meet the request.

• NOAA – No objection to the proposed operation to meet the request.

• USFWS – Supports the operation plan and request.

• BPA – Supports the operation and request.

• Reclamation – Supports and believes this is a reasonable operation to meet the request.

• *Nez Perce – was not on the phone today, but a follow up email exchange between the COE and the Tribe indicated that the Nez Perce Tribe does not object to increasing flows at Libby to 16 kcfs to support the request.

4. AA decision During the August 3, 2011, TMT meeting the AA’s decided increase outflows at Libby on August 3, to 16 kcfs and to operate the project through the month and in September and October to meet the needs specified in the request. The COE will monitor conditions closely and continue to coordinate with the region on this operation as the season progresses.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation AA’s implemented the operation identified in the SOR. This included:

1) managing Libby forebay to achieve less than 2449.0 ft by August 31 (actual 2447.7 ft August 31),
2) discharging 6 kcfs for the month of September, and
3) discharging 4 kcfs for the month of October.
8. If different from AA decision, why?  

 

D2011-C8   Top of Page
8-September-2011 2011-C8 CRITFC Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Autumn 2011 Treaty Fishery
1. SOR request Specifications: Implement the following pool operations as a hard system constraint, as follows: September 12, 2011, 6 am, Monday, through 6 pm, September 16, 2011, Friday. Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period.

2. Participants Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
3. TMT recommendation No objections were received from TMT.
4. AA decision The Corps agreed to operating the Bonneville, John Day and Dalles pools within a 1.5' operating band, hard constraint. Note that the 2008 BiOp sets a 1.5 foot operating range at John Day, hard constraint, through 30 September.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation During the 108 one hour intervals associated with the SOR, Sept 12, the Corps maintained the following system constraints:

Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period --100% compliance. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance.

8. If different from AA decision, why?

 

D2011-C9   Top of Page
16-September-2011 2011-C9 CRITFC Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Autumn 2011 Treaty Fishery
1. SOR request Specifications: Implement the following pool operations as a hard system constraint, as follows: September 19 2011, 6 am, Monday, through 6 pm, September 23, 2011, Friday. Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period.

2. Participants Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
3. TMT recommendation No objections were received from TMT.
4. AA decision The Corps agreed to operating the Bonneville, John Day and Dalles pools within a 1.5' operating band, hard constraint. Note that the 2008 BiOp sets a 1.5 foot operating range at John Day, hard constraint, through 30 September.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation During the 108 one hour intervals associated with the SOR, Sept 19 - 23, the Corps maintained the following system constraints:

Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period --100% compliance. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance.

8. If different from AA decision, why?

 

D2011-C10   Top of Page
23-September-2011 2011-C10 CRITFC Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Autumn 2011 Treaty Fishery
1. SOR request Specifications: Implement the following pool operations as a hard system constraint, as follows: September 26 2011, 6 am, Monday, through 6 pm, September 29, 2011, Thursday. Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period.

2. Participants Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
3. TMT recommendation No objections were received from TMT.
4. AA decision The Corps agreed to operating the Bonneville, John Day and Dalles pools within a 1.5' operating band, hard constraint. Note that the 2008 BiOp sets a 1.5 foot operating range at John Day, hard constraint, through 30 September.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation During the 84 one hour intervals associated with the SOR, Sept 26 - 29, the Corps maintained the following system constraints:

Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period --100% compliance. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance.

8. If different from AA decision, why?

 

D2011-C11   Top of Page
29-September-2011 2011-C11 CRITFC Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Autumn 2011 Treaty Fishery
1. SOR request Specifications: Implement the following pool operations as a hard system constraint, as follows: October 3 2011, 6 am, Monday, through 6 pm, October 6, 2011, Thursday. Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period.

2. Participants Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission.
3. TMT recommendation No objections were received from TMT.
4. AA decision The Corps agreed to operating the Bonneville, John Day and Dalles pools within a 1.5' operating band, hard constraint. Note that the 2008 BiOp sets a 1.5 foot operating range at John Day, hard constraint, through 30 September.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation During the 84 one hour intervals associated with the SOR, Oct 3 - 6, the Corps maintained the following system constraints:

Bonneville: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 98% compliance. The Dalles (Celilo): Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period --100% compliance. John Day: Operate the pool within a 1.5 foot band during the treaty fishing period -- 100% compliance.

8. If different from AA decision, why?

 

USFWS/IDFG-2011-1   Top of Page
27-September-2011 USFWS/IDFG-2011-1 Idaho Department of Fish and Game / US Fish and Wildlife Service Request to implement a 2011-2012 winter lake elevation of 2051’ and a 2012-2013 winter lake elevation of 2055’ for Lake Pend Oreille, Idaho
1. SOR request Specifications:
IDFG and USFWS request that the Army Corps of Engineers (COE) draw Lake Pend Oreille down to a winter minimum control elevation (MCE) no lower than 2051’ in the winter of 2011-2012 and a winter MCE no lower than 2055’ during the winter of 2012-2013. Conduct drawdowns while minimizing or eliminating the need to spill at Albeni Falls Dam. We request that the drawdown be completed by November 8 if reasonably possible. During the past five years, kokanee spawning has commenced around November 8 (earlier than years prior). If this is not possible, the MCE should be reached as soon as possible after November 8 and no later than November 15, and should not be dropped below this elevation for the duration of the winter. During the 2011-2012 drawdown, if kokanee spawning is in progress prior to November 15, and occurs in locations and depths that are deemed vulnerable to continued drawdown, the COE shall, within five days of notification (but not later than November 15), cease drawdown activities even if 2051’ has not been reached. IDFG will monitor arrival time of kokanee at shoreline spawning areas and provide timely reports to the federal agencies. These proposed operations are not anticipated to cause exceedance of the state maximum total dissolved gas standards at downstream projects barring unforeseen circumstances. Lake Pend Oreille will then be held within 0.5’ above the MCE to the end of kokanee spawning (monitored by IDFG) or December 31, whichever comes first.

Justification:
In Lake Pend Oreille, bull trout are heavily dependent upon kokanee as forage. Without kokanee, the Lake Pend Oreille bull trout population is at risk of becoming severely depressed, threatening recovery efforts in both the Idaho and Montana portions of the Pend Oreille basin. Examples of this negative population interaction include Flathead Lake, Montana and Priest Lake, Idaho. Adult kokanee in Lake Pend Oreille are at low, but increasing, abundance. The estimated number of wild female kokanee expected to spawn this fall is about 86,000 fish. Research indicates three decades of annual deep draw downs during the winter months is the primary contributing factor to the large declines in kokanee abundance observed from the 1970’s into the 1990’s. More recently, the combined predation effects of lake trout and rainbow trout have limited kokanee recovery, despite improved egg-to-fry survival as a result of the modified winter lake level management. Both populations of predators are being intensively researched, managed, and controlled to reduce their impacts on kokanee abundance, but kokanee recovery efforts will require adequate egg-to-fry survival in addition to reduced predation to be successful.

A decision tree has been developed (included below) to help guide selection of Lake Pend Oreille winter elevation. Data used in the decision tree in 2011 indicates a 2055’ MCE for the winter of 2011-2012. The decision tree has been, and should continue to be, a useful tool to arrive at a decision that balances the spawning needs of both kokanee in Lake Pend Oreille and chum salmon below Bonneville Dam. However, circumstances have created a desire by managers to deviate from the decision tree for the next two years. The rationale for this recommendation is as follows:

The Lake Pend Oreille kokanee population was recently on the verge of collapse, with record low abundance in 2007. Management efforts in recent years have attempted to provide every advantage to kokanee to prevent population collapse (winter lake level management, kokanee fishery closure, and predator removal). Kokanee survival has improved dramatically, abundance increases have followed, and while abundance is still low relative to recovery goals, the population is trending upwards and there is lower risk of population collapse. We weighed the benefits of a 2055’ MCE this winter (2011-2012) against the benefits an MCE of 2055’ could provide the following year. This request to deviate from the decision tree for the next two years is being made to provide the greatest opportunity for achieving recovery goals in a more timely fashion.

While spawner abundance is the highest it has been since 2005, it is only 16,000 fish above the 70,000 fish threshold identified in the decision tree, and we anticipate a larger spawning population in 2012. An MCE of 2055’ in winter 2012-2013 providing the best spawning conditions for this anticipated larger spawning population should contribute to achieving recovery goals sooner and help rebuild the weak cohort produced with the record low abundance in 2007.

Another factor strongly influencing our recommendation to deviate from the decision tree relates to a study of kokanee spawning ecology. A graduate project through the University of Idaho was developed to provide a better understanding of the role lake level management plays in kokanee egg-to-fry survival. A major component of this study involves incubating kokanee eggs in a variety of substrate types and lake depths, including elevations between 2051’ and 2055’. Field work will begin this year, but most of the lakeshore incubation work will occur during the winter of 2012-2013 and will require a 2055’ MCE to evaluate all elevations influenced by lake level management. Accommodating this study is important because information gained should help guide future Lake Pend Oreille water management decisions.

For these reasons, we recommend drafting Lake Pend Oreille to elevation 2051’ during the winter of 2011-2012 and to elevation 2055’ during the winter of 2012-2013. In both years, the spawning elevation should be maintained as the minimum through kokanee emergence.

2. Participants Idaho Department of Fish and Game / US Fish and Wildlife Service
3. TMT recommendation The following summarizes TMT members comments on the SOR during the September 28, 2011 TMT meeting.

• Oregon – no objection

• Montana – no objection

• Washington –not present; FPAC Chair Paul Wagner reported that Washington had raised concerns about setting up a two year operation, but would likely not object with the caveat that the plan would be revisited next year.

• BPA – no objection if revisit next year

• Reclamation – no objection if revisit next year

• BPA – Supports the operation and request.

• Reclamation – Supports and believes this is a reasonable operation to meet the request.

• CRITFC/CTUIR -- no objection if revisit next year

• COE -- no objection if revisit next year

• Nez Perce – no objection (not in attendance at the meeting but contacted via phone after the meeting)

4. AA decision Based on TMT member’s comments during the September 28, 2011, TMT meeting the AA’s planned to implement the request for this year’s operation. TMT will revisit Lake Pend Oreille operations again next year.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation AA’s implemented the SOR as requested. The AA’s operated Albeni Falls (ALF) elevation as measured at the Hope (HOPI) gauge within a 0.5 ft operational band (2051.0 to 2051.5 ft) during the kokanee spawning operation. On November 6 the HOPI reading was 2051.5 ft and this commenced the operation identified in the SOR. The AA’s operated ALF within the 0.5 band until IDFG declared the 0.5 ft ALF kokanee spawning operation was no longer necessary on December 16. IDFG and USFWS will reiterate the request to TMT in 2012 regarding the desired winter lake level operation of ALF.
8. If different from AA decision, why?  

 

D2011-5   Top of Page
8-November-2011 2011-5 National Marine Fisheries Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission 2011 Bonneville Chum Operation
1. SOR request OBJECTIVE:
Allow chum to spawn in the Ives Island area at elevations higher than the 11.5 foot elevation if fish numbers and hydrologic conditions are favorable.

SPECIFICATIONS:
1. During November 2011, continue to provide a Bonneville tailwater elevation of approximately 11.5 feet (range 11.3 – 12.0 feet).

2. If fish numbers of unspawned adult chum salmon are significant and natural precipitation results in flow levels that require a substantial increase in nighttime flow to maintain the 11.5 foot daytime tailwater, increase the day time tailwater elevation to approximately 12.5 feet to provide additional spawning habitat during the last week of November.

3. If fish numbers are significant and precipitation is sufficient, increase the tailwater elevation to approximately 13.5 feet during the month of December.

4. Maintain the 85% probability of achieving the April 10th flood control target at Grand Coulee Dam. TMT will use the weekly ESP forecasts, the monthly water supply and 90 day climate forecasts and fully consider the decision to reduce the tailwater elevation on a regular basis. If these forecasts indicate that the 85% probability of reaching the April 10 refill objective is at significant risk, the tailwater elevation would be lowered to an appropriate level.

JUSTIFICATION:
The Ives/Pierce Islands Complex below Bonneville Dam represents a limited natural spawning area for ESA listed Columbia River chum and unlisted Lower Columbia River bright fall Chinook. The NOAA 2004 Biological Opinion (BiOp) recognizes that access to spawning habitat in the Ives/Pierce area and Hardy and Hamilton creeks is primarily a function of the water surface elevation. More so, the BiOp and experience over the last thirteen years recognizes that managing water levels to a tailwater gage height rather than a flow level is preferable. Chum populations have dropped and have remained low in the Ives area since 2002. The salmon managers are proposing to allow access to a range of habitats by increasing Bonneville tailwater elevations through the spawning season. Higher tailwater through Bonneville will potentially increase the amount of spawning habitat and change the locations of suitable redds (Garland et al 2003), and may provide additional returns to this area.

To avoid reducing the Bonneville tailwater elevation between the establishment of redds and emergence in the spring while still meeting the Biological Opinion April 10th Flood Control requirements, flow will be incrementally increased with the arrival of adult chum and/or the establishment of redds. Over the past 13 years, adult chum have begun to arrive at Ives spawning sites during, on average, the first week of November. Peak adult observations have occurred during the last week of November (Figure 2b). Redd formation has been observed as early as late October, but the average date of first observation is November 10th. Peak redd density occurs, on average, December 1st.

The salmon managers recognize that this operation increases the risk to achieving the 85% probability of meeting April 10 flood control target at Grand Coulee, which is important for spring migrating interior basin species, if redds are established at higher elevations and maintained through emergence. To help manage this risk the salmon managers will use the weekly ESP forecasts and fully consider the decision to reduce the tailwater elevation on a weekly basis, as well as the monthly water supply and 90 day climate forecasts available. If these forecasts indicate that the 85% probability of reaching the April 10 refill objective is at significant risk, the tailwater elevation would be lowered from 13.5 feet to the 12.5 feet elevation, then to the 11.5 foot elevation and lower still, if the April 10 refill objective appears to be at substantial risk. The strategy of this program is twofold. First, attempt to fill the available spawning area at the lower tailwater elevations and then gradually raise the tailwater to open up more suitable spawning area and reduce the incidence of superimposition of spawners. Second,to help reduce large flow fluctuations and create a more stable spawning condition. Some additional risk exists by placing redds at the higher elevations, but the numbers of redds expected to be formed at these higher elevations will be low, which will reduce the downside risk to the population if they cannot be maintained through emergence. The recent completion of additional spawning habitat in the Hamilton spring channel site should further reduce the risk to chum salmon spawning in the Ives Island area.

On October 21, 2011, two live chum adults were observed at the Ives/Pierce Complex (http://www.fpc.org/spawning/spawning_surveys/ODFW_reports/2011spawning.htm.). This is the earliest first date of observation in the past 13 years (Figure 2a). On November 1, 2011, nineteen live chum were observed at the Ives/Pierce Complex.
2. Participants National Marine Fisheries Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission
3. TMT recommendation The SOR was presented to TMT during the November 9 meeting. NOAA, presented the SOR on behalf of all the signatories, and noted this was a framework recommended for consideration while moving through the chum season, rather than a specific operation recommendation. It was intended to be implemented if flows support it, to allow access to additional spawning habitat areas, and to provide more natural flow conditions rather than big fluctuations between day and night time hours.
4. AA decision The AA’s decided the chum operation would continue to target an 11.5 feet (11.3-12.0’ feet) tailwater elevation at Bonneville. Weekly field observations conducted by WDFW would inform FPAC and TMT discussions. TMT will revisit the issue on a weekly basis to discuss operations moving forward.
5. IT recommendation  
6. AA decision (after IT)  
7. Actual Operation AA’s implemented the SOR as requested. The AA’s made the following Bonneville Dam tailwater changes in coordination with TMT: 1) November 1 tailwater operation of 11.3 to 11.7 ft., 2) November 2 tailwater operation of 11.3 – 12.0 ft., and 3) November 23 11.7 to 12.5 ft. BON tailwater was not increased after November 23 due to lack of water supply.
8. If different from AA decision, why?