01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
B1
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
MT1
U1
U2
30-Oct-2002 | 2002-08 | CRITFC | Tailwater elevation at Bonneville Dam to protect natural spawning of chum and fall chinook salmon at the Ives/Pierce Island Complex and the I-205 seeps. |
---|
1. SOR-request |
Beginning November 1 and continuing until further notice, provide a minimum instantaneous tailrace elevation of 11.5 feet at Bonneville Dam. On average it is anticipated that daily average flows will not exceed 125 Kcfs. |
2. Participants | USFWS, NMFS, IDFG, CRITFC, ODFW |
3. TMT-recommendation | Starting Tuesday, November 5 at 0700 hours. The operation will be: hard constraint 10.8' and target 11.0' between 0700 - 1900 hours. Between 1900 - 0700 hours project can exceed 11' if needed to move water to maintain lower tailwaters during daylight hours. |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation |
As stated in TMT recommendation above for one day. The Bonneville operation changed to a hard constraint of above 11.1ft on November 6 with a soft constraint of 11.1 - 11.5 ft. between 0700 - 1900, with a target elevation of 11.3 ft. Operation changed to a hard constraint of above 11.3ft on November 13 with a soft constraint of 11.3 - 11.7 ft. between 0700 - 1900 target 11.5 ft. The hard constraint was met all of the time except for one hour when the tailwater limit had just been changed. The Bonneville tailwater switched from spawning to incubation flows for chum protection on 31 December. At this time the operation for incubating chum shifted to an 11.2 ft. hard constraint, 11.4 ft. soft constraint around the clock as the minimum elevation. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
25-Sep-2002 | 2002-B1 | CRITFC | Request for limited releases from Libby Dam for migration and spawning of burbot in the Kootenai River |
---|
1. SOR-request |
|
2. Participants | Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, Idaho Office of Species Conservation, IDFG, Boundary County Commissioners, City of Bonners Ferry, USFWS |
3. TMT-recommendation | Question was raised to IT "Should this special operation occur in the absence of a listing? Put another way, is there a regional benefit to avoiding a listing by taking action now or should the listing occur first before the region invests BPA funding in these operations? Is there a regional benefit for BPA to spend money to increase the probability of a burbot operation from50% to 95%?" |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | BPA and USFWS will continue to work to find a more optimal operation that is cost-neutral and more beneficial to burbot. If no other alternative is found, then BPA's "preferred operation" will be implemented with a steeper ramp down from full powerhouse at the end of December to get to 7.3 kcfs as soon as possible. |
6. AA decision (after IT) | provide flows within the SOR range on 37 of the 45 days requested. Ramp down to 7.3 Kcfs as early as possible, and to hold it for as long as possible. No objections were raised to this characterization. |
7. Actual Operation | Low flows for burbot began December 25 at 7.3 kcfs Libby discharge. 7.3 kcfs was discharged until December 29. Flows were then ramped down to 4 kcfs, the Libby project minimum flow, by 3 January and held at 4 kcfs through the end of January. The outflow of 4 kcfs continued after January and remains in effect. It could last until late May or June 2003. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
18-Sep-2002 | 2002-C11 | CRITFC | Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Autumn 2002 Treaty Fishery |
---|
1. SOR-request |
September 25th, 2002, 6 am, Wednesday, through 6 pm, September 28th, 2002, Saturday
Bonneville Pool: Operate the pool within 1.0 foot from full pool (msl
elevation 77 - 76) |
2. Participants | CRITFC |
3. TMT-recommendation | As a result of coordination among the Corps, BPA, and CRITFC: Hold BON pool within a 1.5 foot range, elevations 75.0 - 76.5 feet, as a hard constraint from 0600 Wed, 25 SEP 02 - 1800 Sat SEP 02, subject to periodic review of river and power system conditions. |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | Elevation limits were provided 100% of the time for the range stated in the TMT Recommendation above. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
12-Sep-2002 | 2002-C10 | CRITFC | Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Autumn 2002 Treaty Fishery |
---|
1. SOR-request |
Implement the following operations as a hard system constraint as
follows:
September 16th, 2002, 6 am, Monday, through 6 pm, September 20th, 2002, Friday
Bonneville Pool: Operate the pool within 1.0 foot from full pool (msl
elevation 77 - 76) Maintain flows through all of the Zone 6 pools at a near constant rate. Fluctuate no more than plus or minus 10 kcfs from the beginning of the fishery to the end of the fishery. |
2. Participants | CRITFC |
3. TMT-recommendation | As a result of coordination among the Corps, BPA, and CRITFC: Hold BON pool within a 1.5 foot range, elevations 75.0 - 76.5 feet, as a soft constraint from 0600 Mon, 16 SEP 02 - 0600 Tue, 17 SEP 02and as a hard constraint from 0600 Tue, 17 SEP 02 - 1800 Fri, 20 SEP 02, subject to periodic review of river and power system conditions. |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | Elevation limits were provided 100% of the time for the range stated in the TMT Recommendation above. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
15-Aug-2002 | 2002-C9 | CRITFC | Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Autumn 2002 Treaty Fishery |
---|
1. SOR-request |
Implement the following operations as a hard system constraint as
follows:
August 28th, 2002, 6 am, Wednesday, through 6 pm, August 31st, 2002,
Saturday
Bonneville Pool: Operate the pool within 1.0 foot from full pool (msl
elevation 77 - 76) Maintain flows through all of the Zone 6 pools at a near constant rate. Fluctuate no more than plus or minus 10 kcfs from the beginning of the fishery to the end of the fishery. |
2. Participants | CRITFC |
3. TMT-recommendation | As a result of coordination among the Corps, BPA, and CRITFC: Hold BON pool within a 1.5 foot range, elevations 75.0 - 76.5 feet, as a hard constraint, during these dates and times, subject to periodic review of river and power system conditions. |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | Elevation limits were provided 100% of the time for the range stated in the TMT Recommendation above. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
14-Aug-2002 | 2002-07 | USFWS, NMFS, IDFG, CRITFC, WDFW | August - September operation for Dworshak reservoir |
---|
1. SOR-request |
Operate Dworshak Dam to provide the following outflows for the period
August 15 through September 14, 2002.
|
2. Participants | USFWS, NMFS, IDFG, CRITFC, WDFW |
3. TMT-recommendation | SOR 2002-07 be implemented as written. |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | Dworshak outflow reduced to 12.10 August 25, 2002. Reduced to 10 kcfs on September 1, reduced to 1.6 on September 11. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
6-Aug-2002 | 2002-MT1 | State of Montana | Libby Operations for the remainder of August and September |
---|
1. SOR-request | As soon as practical, reduce flows out of Libby dam to 11 kcfs and maintain as close as possible to this flow until the end of September. Maintaining a flow of 11 kcfs from Libby is estimated to require drafting Koocanusa to elevation 2449 at the end of September based on current inflow forecasts. Since the projected outflow is based on forecasts of inflows to Lake Koocanusa the actual flows should be gradually adjusted to achieve the desired ending elevation at the end of September. Any flow changes should be effected by following the flow ramp rates in the Biological Opinion for bull trout. |
2. Participants | State of Montana |
3. TMT-recommendation | Flows from Libby will be reduced to 16 kcfs as soon as possible, depending on the timing of the Libby/Duncan swap. |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | Flows were reduced to 18 kcfs by August 9, 2002 (Value to support Libby / Duncan swap). Outflow reduced to 17 kcfs August 12, 2002. Outflows were ramped down from 17 kcfs to 12 kcfs between August 26th to August 30th. Discharge reduced to 6 kcfs on September 1, to conserve water for power operations later. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
18-Jul-2002 | 2002-06 | USFWS, ODFW, IDFG, CRITFC | Hungry Horse and Grand Coulee Summer Operations |
---|
1. SOR-request |
|
2. Participants | USFWS, ODFW, IDFG, CRITFC |
3. TMT-recommendation |
4 kcfs will be released out of Hungry Horse on July 20. Tony will present ramping scenarios to TMT at the July 24 meeting, as requested. Hungry Horse will ramp to 6 kcfs for two to three weeks in August. Sometime in August or September, Hungry Horse will ramp down to 4 kcfs until 3540' is reached. Increase Hungry Horse outflow to 6 Kcfs on August 5. |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | 4 kcfs released starting July 20, 2002. Flow increased to 6 kcfs July 31, 2002. Flow was reduced to 4 kcfs August 20, 2002 |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
26-Jun-2002 | 2002-C8 | CRITFC | Dworshak Summer Operation Plan |
---|
1. SOR-request |
Implement the following operational guidelines. If river conditions
degrade dramatically or flow varies significantly from the predicted
model simulations during the period of the specified operation (1-9), in
season management options will be discussed. We request that data being
collected by the Corps monitoring program outlined by RPA measure 143 be
made available for the weekly TMT meetings or discuss an alternative
reporting schedule.
|
2. Participants | CRITFC |
3. TMT-recommendation | Keep Dworshak full until July 3rd.Pass inflow until July 7th. Increase outflow to 14 kcfs July 8th. |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | Outflow reached 13.5 kcfs July 11th. Flow kept at around that level until August 25th when flows reduced to around 12 kcfs. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
25-Jun-2002 | 2002-05 | USFWS, NMFS, ODFW, CRITFC, Nez Perce Tribe, WDFW | Brownlee Operations for Fall Chinook Migration |
---|
1. SOR-request |
Draft Brownlee reservoir to shape USBR water which will not pass through Brownlee until after July 31 to assist in meeting the July / early August flow objective at Lower Granite Reservoir. This draft will likely be between 150 and 215 kaf (elevation 2066' to 2061' from full pool) by July 31. This volume of pass through and draft should total between 300 and 427 kaf of USBR water from the Upper Snake River basin.. Draft an additional 137 KAF of water volume by August 10, to assist in meeting the summer flow objective of 51 kcfs at Lower Granite, pursuant to the current Northwest Power Planning Council Fish and Wildlife Program draft from Brownlee Reservoir. Draft the remainder of the Northwest Power Planning Council required volume from Brownlee reservoir, 100 KAF during the rest of August to assist in meeting the summer flow objective of 51 kcfs at Lower Granite Reservoir. It would be most beneficial for salmon to begin refill at Brownlee after August 31. Flow augmentation should be provided in a manner to avoid adverse impacts to water quality and other fish and wildlife resources. USBR should take all reasonable effort to deliver water held as powerhead for Anderson Ranch, Palisades, and Minidoka to minimize the deficit between the 427 KAF and actual deliveries. |
2. Participants | USFWS, NMFS, ODFW, CRITFC, Nez Perce Tribe, WDFW |
3. TMT-recommendation | Idaho Power Company declined to draft Brownlee early with out a shaping agreement with BPA. USBR stated that the power head at Anderson Ranch has already been used, and that they are unable to use the powerhead at Palisades and Minidoka is not available, because it would be a change of use the state of Idaho does not recognize in-stream flows as a beneficial use. |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | July 31 elevation at Brownlee was 2071.9 |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
21-May-2002 | 2002-04 | USFWS, NMFS, ODFW, IDFG, CRITFC, Nez Perce Tribe, WDFW | Biological Opinion flow objective at Lower Granite Dam from May 22, 2002 through May 28, 2002 and BiOp flow objective at McNary Dam from May 22 through June 2. |
---|
1. SOR-request |
Adjust DWR outflows in accordance with flows recorded at LWG above the 97 kcfs BiOp flow objective. Begin passing inflows at the Brownlee reservoir to meet the BiOp flow objective of 97 kcfs at LWG. Meet the BiOp flow objective of 246 kcfs at MCN. This includes potential drafting of GCL to 1237 feet and incorporates the 15 May BOR agreement to not fill GCL above 1240 feet if the flow objective of 246 kcfs at MCN is not being met. |
2. Participants | USFWS, NMFS, ODFW, IDFG, CRITFC, Nez Perce Tribe, WDFW |
3. TMT-recommendation |
At DWR provide up to 10 kcfs discharge, and total volume up to 50 ksfd (~100 kaf), as needed to attempt to meet 97 kcfs weekly average flow at LWG. Weekly average flow is for 20 - 27 May, which includes Memorial Day. Shape higher discharges earlier in the augmentation period, less during the holiday weekend, for load shaping. For the 2-week operational planning period, 28 May - 9 June, operate DWR at minimum for end-of-June refill and operate GCL as needed down to 1240 ft. to meet a weekly average flow of 246 kcfs at MCN. GCL may draft to 1237 feet if needed to meet 220 kcfs at MCN. Refill GCL to the extent possible while meeting flood control. Draft Little Goose pool to MOP on 24 or 25 May to support lower Snake flows as they recede. Refill to MOP +1 when flows are low enough that the operation is again needed for navigation, likely late June. End full flow bypass at Lower Monumental on 2 June. COE will provide additional days if requested by fish agencies, as long as fish collections for research are not impacted. Idaho Power Company plans to pass inflow at Brownlee for several days, refill to 2077 feet by the end of May, and hold near full in June while passing inflow. |
4. AA-decision | Implement according to the TMT recommendation. |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | DWR increased to 10 kcfs on 24 May. Flow decreased to 7.5 kcfs on 27 May 2002. Weekly average flow at LWG = 98.2 kcfs, at MCN = 256.5 kcfs. It was not necessary to draft Grand Coulee to achieve these flows. LGS operation changed to MOP to MOP + 1 May 24. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
15-May-2002 | 2002-C7 | CRITFC | Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Spring 2002 Treaty Fishery |
---|
1. SOR-request |
From 0600 17 May 2002 until 1800 18 May 2002:
|
2. Participants | CRITFC |
3. TMT-recommendation | As a result of coordination and prior understanding among the Corps, BPA, and CRITFC: Hold BON pool within a 1.5 foot range, elevations 75.0 - 76.5 feet, as a hard constraint, during these dates and times, subject to periodic review of river and power system conditions: |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | Elevation limits were provided 92% of the time for the range stated in the TMT Recommendation above. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
14-May-2002 | 2002-03 | ODFW, USFWS, CRITFC, WDFW, IDFG, NMFS | Implementation of the NMFS Biological Opinion |
---|
1. SOR-request |
|
2. Participants | ODFW, USFWS, CRITFC, WDFW, IDFG, NMFS |
3. TMT-recommendation | Provide 220 Kcfs weekly average flow for the period 20 - 26 May at McNary. If natural flows don't start to pick up, and it is necessary to draft Grand Coulee to maintain the MCN flow, BOR will draft as low as elevation 1237 ft., unless a deeper draft is required to maintain the 135 Kcfs week-average flow at Priest Rapids |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | MCN weekly flow average for 20 - 26 May was 254.8 kcfs. Priest Rapids weekly flow average was 150.5 kcfs. Grand Coulee lowest forebay was 1240.4. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? | Additional draft not needed to maintain desired flows. |
14-May-2002 | 2002-02 | ODFW, USFWS, CRITFC, WDFW, IDFG, NMFS | Implementation of the NMFS Biological Opinion and adherence to established procedures. |
---|
1. SOR-request |
|
2. Participants | ODFW, USFWS, CRITFC, WDFW, IDFG, NMFS |
3. TMT-recommendation | Continue to implement BiOp spill levels for fish passage. TMT members will review current emergency procedures and actions list. |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | BiOp spill continued at mainstem lower Columbia/Snake River projects. TMT action agency representatives updated the emergency actions list, for TMT review. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
8-May-2002 | 2002-C6 | CRITFC | Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Spring 2002 Treaty Fishery |
---|
1. SOR-request |
From 0600 10 May 2002 until 1800 11 May 2002:
|
2. Participants | CRITFC |
3. TMT-recommendation | As a result of coordination and prior understanding among the Corps, BPA, and CRITFC: Hold BON pool within a 1.5 foot range, elevations 75.0 - 76.5 feet, as a hard constraint, during these dates and times, subject to periodic review of river and power system conditions: |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | Elevation limits were provided 92% of the time for the range stated in the TMT recommendation above. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
2-May-2002 | 2002-C5 | CRITFC | May 2002 Flows for Hanford Reach, Lower Snake, and Lower Columbia |
---|
1. SOR-request |
|
2. Participants | CRITFC |
3. TMT-recommendation | Draft Grand Coulee to 1240' in the next ten days and keep flow targets at Priest Rapids at 135 kcfs or greater. |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | 10 day average outflow at Priest Rapids ( 5/3 - 5-12) was 145.9 kcfs. Grand Coulee Drafted to 1242 feet (5/10/02) |
8. If different from AA decision, why? | Due to inflow increases, additional draft not needed to maintain 135 at Priest Rapids. |
30-Apr-2002 | 2002-C4 | CRITFC | Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Spring 2002 Treaty Fishery |
---|
1. SOR-request |
From 0600 2 May 2002 until 1800 4 May 2002:
|
2. Participants | CRITFC |
3. TMT-recommendation | As a result of coordination and prior understanding among the Corps, BPA, and CRITFC: Hold BON pool within a 1.5 foot range, elevations 75.0 - 76.5 feet, as a hard constraint, during these dates and times, subject to periodic review of river and power system conditions: |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | Elevation limits were provided 100% of the time for the range stated in the TMT recommendation above. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
23-Apr-2002 | 2002-U2 | USFWS | Kootenai River Sturgeon Spawning/Incubation and Bull Trout Flows |
---|
1. SOR-request |
|
2. Participants | USFWS |
3. TMT-recommendation | Implement requested flows, dependent on real-time water supply and river conditions, through in-season management by TMT. |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | Augmentation flows for bull trout started 15 May 2002, at a level of 8 kcfs. Flows were ramped up to 18 kcfs between June 5 and 6 because of the need to avoid filling the project to soon. Flow was increased to 26 kcfs from June 10 and 11. The Libby spill test took place June 25 - 27. During and spill test the flows were increased to 32 kcfs, again to avoid filling the project to soon. Outflows continued to increase to a peak of 40 kcfs July 3. Flows were ramped down to 24.4 kcfs by July 7. Flows started increasing July 11th due to increasing inflows, reaching a peak of 30 kcfs July 15. At the end of July flows were 22 kcfs. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
23-Apr-2002 | 2002-C3 | CRITFC | Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Spring 2002 Treaty Fishery |
---|
1. SOR-request |
From 0600 25 April 2002 until 1800 27 April 2002:
|
2. Participants | CRITFC |
3. TMT-recommendation | As a result of coordination and prior understanding among the Corps, BPA, and CRITFC: Hold BON pool within a 1.5 foot range, elevations 75.0 - 76.5 feet, as a hard constraint, during these dates and times, subject to periodic review of river and power system conditions: |
4. AA-decision | Implement according to the TMT recommendation. |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | Elevation limits were provided 100% of the time for the range stated in the TMT Recommendation above. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
12-Apr-2002 | 2002-C2 | CRITFC | Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Spring 2002 Treaty Fishery |
---|
1. SOR-request |
From 0600 15 April 2002 until 1800 20 April 2002:
|
2. Participants | CRITFC |
3. TMT-recommendation | As a result of coordination and prior understanding among the Corps, BPA, and CRITFC: Hold BON pool within a 1.5 foot range, elevations 75.0 - 76.5 feet, as a hard constraint, during these dates and times, subject to periodic review of river and power system conditions: |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | BON reservoir elevation limits were provided 100% of the time for the range stated in the TMT recommendation above. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
2-Apr-2002 | 2002-C1 | CRITFC | Operation of the Lower Columbia Pools for the Spring 2002 Treaty Fishery |
---|
1. SOR-request |
From 0600 2 April 2002 until 1800 13 April 2002:
|
2. Participants | CRITFC |
3. TMT-recommendation | As a result of coordination and prior understanding among the Corps, BPA, and CRITFC: Hold BON pool within a 1.5 foot range, elevations 75.0 - 76.5 feet, as a soft constraint, during these dates and times, subject to periodic review of river and power system conditions: |
4. AA-decision | Implement according to the TMT recommendation. |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | Elevation limits were provided 97% of the time for the range stated in the TMT Recommendation above. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |
5-Mar-2002 | 2002-01 | ODFW, USFWS, CRITFC, WDFW, NMFS | Spill and Flow at Bonneville Dam for the Spring Creek Hatchery Release |
---|
1. SOR-request |
|
2. Participants | ODFW, USFWS, CRITFC, WDFW, NMFS |
3. TMT-recommendation | No recommendation was obtained. Issue was raised to IT. |
4. AA-decision | |
5. IT-recommendation | Provide 200 KAF total additional volume (above the 125 Kcfs average flow that would otherwise be provided at Bonneville), a 14.5-foot minimum tailwater elevation at Bonneville to ensure adequate depth compensation, and 115% tailrace TDG cap at Bonneville. |
6. AA decision (after IT) | Release 150 kcfs from Bonneville with a spill level of 50 kcfs staring 12 March 2002. From 0900 hours 13 March 2002 to 1200 hours 14 March 2002 discharge 170 kcfs including an initial spill level of 70 kcfs. Then go back to 150 kcfs discharge with 50 kcfs spill. The Spring Creek spill operation will cease at 0800 15 March 15 2002 when the 200 KAF is used up. Minimum tailwater level of 13.5 feet will be maintained. |
7. Actual Operation | 150 kcfs released from Bonneville starting 0900 12 March 2002 with a spill level of 50 kcfs. Outflow was increased to 170 kcfs at 1700 12 March 2002 and stayed at or above that level until 1200 14 March 2002 when flow was reduced to 150 kcfs. This outflow level continued until the operation ended at 0600 15 March 2002. Spill was increased to 70 kcfs at 2000 12 March 2000 and continued until 1300 13 March 2002 when the spill level was raised to 100 kcfs. Spill was reduced to 50 kcfs at 1200 14 March 2002 and continued until 0600 15 March 2002. Tail water was above the 13.5 feet level during the entire operation. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? | Heavy rains occurred which resulted in higher BON flows. |
9-Jan-2002 | 2002-U1 | USFWS, IDFG | Request for releases from Libby Dam for migration, spawning, incubation, and larval development of burbot in the Kootenai River. |
---|
1. SOR-request | Release 6 to 10 kcfs as soon as possible continuing until 8 February 2002. Use established ramp rates. As soon as possible continuing until 15 March 2002 operate the selective withdrawal system at Libby Dam to release the coldest available water. |
2. Participants | USFWS, IDFG |
3. TMT-recommendation | The COE will release 14.5 kcfs out of Libby. They will monitor and decrease outflows if possible, but will keep release levels relatively stable. |
4. AA-decision | Implement according to the TMT recommendation. |
5. IT-recommendation | |
6. AA decision (after IT) | |
7. Actual Operation | Flow was ramped up from 10 kcfs to 14.5 kcfs starting 10 January 2002. 14.5 Kcfs was reached 11 Jan 2002. 14.5 Kcfs flow continued until 5 February 2002 when it was necessary to increase outflow due to flood control requirements. |
8. If different from AA decision, why? |